Youth, Racism, and Poverty in Global Contexts

28 05 2008

In the Jose Padilha’s (2002) Bus 174, a symptom of a greater social problem is depicted. This is a documentary with real footage of a bus hijacking in Rio de Janeiro in 2000.

Bus 174 is told from a retrospective point of view. It starts with the bus hijacking but then goes back into Sandro’s life and Brazil’s social context to explain not only what led to the event, but also Brazil’s situation and why this is a symptom of a more important problem. The film gives the story of Sandro do Nascimento and explains how he holds a bus hostage on June 12, 2000 ending in the loss of his life and one hostage, Geisa. As a boy Sandro witnesses the violent murder of his mother and runs away to become a street kid. This is something extremely common in Brazil. He grows up in the streets and makes a living by steeling. He is caught and sent to jail multiple times. Along with the police reports depicted in the film, there is also mention of his psychological profile. He is said to be angry with society, though not particularly aggressive and always mentions the death of his mother. Another major event takes place in Rio de Janeiro, affecting Sandro directly. In 1993 the Church of La Candelaria would allow street children to seek refuge and sleep outside its doors. The nuns supplied blankets and pillows for the children. After a run-in with police, some of the children were followed back to the church. After dusk these police officers seek revenge on the children by opening fire on them. This event is known as the massacre of La Candelaria; no police investigation, no one found guilty. Some people didn’t care.
Homeless children in Brazil often sniff glue and consume cocaine not only for recreational purposes, but also to suppress hunger pains. They would often be assaulted by strangers as they slept on the streets. In the film a boy says that he always made sure to cover his head while sleeping because often people would drop heavy rocks on the unsuspecting victims, scattering the brains all over the pavement.
As Sandro grows up he continues to commit small crimes, consume cocaine, glue and other drugs and finds refuge with an older woman who treats him like a son. The jails he goes to, and eventually escapes out of, are those of a horror film. These jails house underage offenders and are shown as primitive holding cells and violent guards. He finds himself on a bus in morning rush hour in front of the Jardim Botanico in Rio and holds it hostage. The reasons are unknown and the film goes into his background to find a reason. From the testimony given by the hostages and previous acquaintances of Sandro his motive was not to kill, it was an act out of desperation and drug consumption. He uses the overwhelming media coverage to voice the complaints of his life, including the Candelaria massacre as well as the pitfalls of being a street kid in Rio de Janeiro. He forms a strange relationship with the women he held hostage and asked them to act scared as to help him save himself. As he shot one of the hostages to continue threatening police, he asked her to scream out because the bullet would not hit her. This in fact was what happened. As he tries to get off the bus, he uses on of his hostages Geisa as a shield. This results in her death. We find out at the end of the film that as an officer attempts to shoot Sandro, he misses and shoots Geisa in the face, this is followed by three shots by Sandro in her back. He is then captured, taken into custody in a police vehicle and suffocated to death by the arresting officers. The officers were charged with murder but found not guilty by a jury of their peers.

As we can only cringe at the story major themes of social problems are tackled by the narrative. They not only talk about Sandro’s life but also mention how Brazil views its street kids. Street children are ignored in the streets of Rio de Janeiro and are seen as the trash of society. They are hungry for recognition and social existence. Sandro becomes an outcry from the kids on the street living in a world of violence, racism that have become a stigma and are viewed as the garbage of society. Another theme tackled by the narrative is the lack of preparedness of the police. The film mentions all of the mistakes the police made in this case. They cordon off the area and the media was as close as could be to the bus, they do not take many opportunities the shoot the hijacker with a sniper, and they do not neutralize the situation. Not to mention they shot and killed a hostage and suffocated the perpetrator while in custody. This is contrasted with the opinions of the Rio SWAT team’s opinion. They speak of lack of police training as well as that they see their duty is to kill and arrest criminals. They also mention that to be a policeman is seen as the last option one has for a job and is not socially desired. One of the interviewees says that policemen are just as filled with hatred and violence as the street kids, except they have power and weapons.

Here are some statistics and details on social context.

Brazil started slave trade in 1550 and lasted until 1888, bringing in more than 4 million slaves to Brazil. This totaled 35.4% of the slaves traded in the Atlantic slave trade. To put this in perspective the United States lasted from 1619 to 1860 and comprised 4.4% of the Atlantic slave trade totaling at around 500,000 slaves. (http://africanhistory.about.com/library/weekly/aa080601a.htm).

Brazil ranks among the world’s highest nations in the Gini coefficient index of inequality assessment. Poverty in Brazil is most visually represented by the various favelas, slums in the country’s metropolitan areas and remote upcountry regions that suffer with economic underdevelopment and below-par standards of living. These are some of the current social issues:

- Low minimum wage
- Inefficient pension system
- Poor health services
- Poor social security services
- High level of violent crimes
- Income inequality
- High illiteracy rate
- Difference on life expectancy

The reason why these statistics are relevant is because the prevalence of racism and violence in Brazil seems higher than in the US and therefore social problems seem much more severe. What do you think are some of the symptoms of racism and social displacement of the US? Do you think these problems are decreasing or increasing?

- by Ikira





Week 9: Disjunctures, Mediascapes, and Global Cultural Flows

26 05 2008



ArjunAppadurai’s (1996/2003) Modernity at Large

In Chapter 2, “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy,” Appadurai proposes a framework for exploring disjunctures and offers five dimensions of global cultural flows or “scapes.” One could argue that all of five are relevant to our study of youth, schools, and race in film. In your reading and interpretation, how do these scapes relate to the topics we have covered in class this quarter? The links may not be as apparent. Would you say that there are links? If so, what are they? And how do these scapes, in particular mediascapes, help us to think more broadly about the production and distribution of images/narratives?

Appadurai also writes about the importance of unleashing imagination as a key component of the new global order. “The imagination has become an organized field of social practices, a form of work (in the sense of both labor and culturally organized practice), and a form of negotiation between sites of agency (individuals) and globally defined sites of possibility” (p. 31). How does this statement relate to you or the final class project you have proposed and in the process of completing? Also, given your reading and analysis of the film documentary, Born Into Brothels, what would you say are some of the ways participants (including producers) used imagination to tap into “sites of possibility”? What are your critiques, if any?

[You have the option to answer one or more of the questions. I'm interested in the connections you are making. The field is wide open.]





Week 8: Urban vs. Suburban, Culture of Conformity

19 05 2008

In Chapter 4 of his book, Hollywood Goes to High School, Robert Bulman (2005) states, “The urban and suburban high school films are consistently told from different points of view, have different moods, have different heroes and villains, tell different stories, and teach different lessons” (p. 80). Please choose a character from a film that’s discussed in this chapter and describe how realistic the events that he/she experiences are. In addition, does this character and his/her experiences reflect something that happened to you or your peers in your high school? Or more generally, are there any parallels from what we read about in Chapter 4 of Bulman to what happens in an actual high school setting?

After reading Bulman’s analysis on the differences between urban and suburban high school films, and after your experience in the class, Youth, Schools, and Race in Film, has your interpretation of films of the high school genre changed since your high school or middle school years?

Furthermore, imagine this scenario. A young, new producer wants to produce a film based on actual experiences of students in a suburban high school. How could he go about this? What does he need to change from current suburban high school films? How about if he wants to paint a “realistic” depiction of urban high school students? What does he need to change? Or is there anything to change?

- by Alison/Edwin/Esther/Ikira/Sera





Week 5: Stigmatization, Politics of Achievement

29 04 2008

Stacey Lee’s (2002) Unraveling the “Model Minority” Stereotype

• How does the model minority stereotype affect students’ identity development?

• In what ways do other stereotypes affect identity development in general?

• What are the implications in choosing to identify as American (e.g. Asian vs. Asian American, Mexican vs. Mexican-American)?

• How do students navigate gender and class norms in ethnic identity development?

For a live performance on the topic, check out this video link!

Also, if you’re interested, check out a related clip from Jane Elliott’s Iowa School Children Experiment.

- by Takeo/Diana/Michael T.





Week 3: Individualism, Social Contexts of Schooling

13 04 2008

Robert Bulman’s (2005) Hollywood Goes to High School

What is Bulman’s problem with the “autonomous utilitarian individual” as a mark of success in films? Why is it a problem to him? Do you think this is a problem?

What do you think about Bulman’s response to the concept of inner city poor minority students having a “choice” in their schooling?

What do you think filmmakers are trying to portray through their depictions of urban high schools: a sense of whiteness (like Giroux talks about) or a standard of middle class values (like Bulman promotes in his book)?

Let’s start by answering the first question and then we can move into the next two as the conversation goes along.

- by Stany/Ryann/Alana





Week 2: Reading the Media, Critique and Analysis

7 04 2008

Douglas Kellner is one of the leading scholars of media culture and pedagogy. In “Cultural Studies, Multiculturalism, and Media Culture,” Kellner (2003) discusses the contributions of a cultural studies approach to media critique. What are these contributions? Why are they valuable to our study of youth, schools, and race in film?

Later in the chapter, Kellner argues for an approach that is critical and multiperspectival. What does this mean? How does one achieve or move toward that? Why is it of importance?

[note: let’s begin the conversation with the first set of questions...]